Compromised Political Leaders – Fall Of 55 Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:25:20 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Compromised Political Leaders – Fall Of 55 32 32 Senate Capitol Riots report overlooks GOP lawmakers who were there – and still in office Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:10:07 +0000

Americans watched in horror as an angry mob stormed our Capitol in January. On Tuesday, the Senate released a bipartisan report outlining the security flaws that allowed the breach and a list of recommendations to protect the building from another attack.

Sixteen Republican state lawmakers who were in Washington on Jan.6 still hold public office and continue to pass democracy bills they attacked.

The report, while important, does not sufficiently address a key aspect of the riot: the dangerous undercurrent of conspiracy theorists serving in our country’s state legislatures. At least 20 Republican state lawmakers were at or near the January 6 riot, and many others spread the type of lies the angry mob would later use as justification for their cause.

Sixteen Republican state lawmakers who were in Washington on January 6 still hold public office and continue to pass democracy bills they attacked using their platform as a public official to try to overturn fair and free elections. Many are also spearhead efforts to pass sweeping sets of voter suppression laws.

Until these officials are removed from their government positions and held accountable, the danger will persist. Senators investigating what happened on January 6 cannot only be concerned with police misconduct and inadequate preparation; they must also look within the Republican Party.

But the insurgents are not the only problem. There are a lot more Republicans within our state houses which prompted former President Donald Trump’s “Big Lie” that the election was stolen and fanned the flames of the insurgency. They keep doing it.

Indeed, instead of taking a measured stand against insurgents and conspiracy theorists, Republican members have welcomed and allowed bad actors in their party. In fact, the top GOP official who has faced party repudiation is someone who refused to accept the election lies: Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, who was ousted from the Republican House leadership. of the United States for its commitment to the truth.

Brand names like Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene may grab headlines, but the problem of radical Republican extremism runs much deeper than a few notorious individuals in Washington. To take an example: Mark Finchem, a representative for the state of Arizona, is affiliated with far-right groups like the Oath Keepers and the Coalition of Western States. It is considered a extremist by the Anti-Defamation League Center on Extremism for its involvement in these groups.

Finchem assisted the violent insurgency in DC and initially defended the rioters, although he later attempted to claim that it was in fact antifa that stormed the Capitol. Recently, new evidence has emerged which appears to show that the lawmaker right in front of the Capitol after rioters broke through a series of barricades and police lines. Finchem is now a candidate for the post of Secretary of State, although he was at the center of the effort to overturn the Arizona election results last year. Arizona Republicans responded with bury a bill to expel it and the laundering of 82 ethical complaints linked to his participation in the January 6 riot.

The revelation about Finchem’s activities in Washington follows a Discovery about Pennsylvania State Senator Doug Mastriano, who initially claimed he left the area as soon as the mob turned violent. Newly released images show he was apparently closer to the Capitol headquarters than he originally suggested.

At the time, GOP State Senate Chairman Pro Tempore Jake Corman said the Senate had “no reason to act”In the face of calls to remove Mastriano from his post. Since then, the GOP leadership has repeatedly refused to comment on new evidence regarding his conduct during the insurgency. Masstriano is now exploring a race for governor. He said Trump wanted him to show up and that he change Pennsylvania election laws. Matriano too organized bus for insurgency participants and advocated for Pennsylvania election results to be reversed.

Beyond the threat these lawmakers represent to their positions, the failure to hold elected officials who witnessed the riot accountable serves to embolden further. Many participants in the January 6 riot are office candidate, an alarming development which jeopardizes any chance of moving forward.

Even Republican leaders who did not attend the riot are spreading disinformation about this and our elections in their home states. Mike Shirkey, Michigan’s top Republican, has appeared with the state’s far-right militias; He has even offered to help they work on their messaging. In the aftermath of the insurgency, Shirkey said he sympathized with the mob, then called it hoax and hinted that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell may have played a role. He also hinted that there is “puppeteers»Controlling elected officials.

Despite these lopsided thoughts, Shirkey is still the head of the Michigan Senate GOP. The National Republican Legislative Campaign Committee, instead of condemning the legislator, welcomed him on their tray.

The insurgents are not the only problem. There are many more Republicans in our state houses who pushed the “big lie” of former President Donald Trump.

In Arizona, Republican Senate Speaker Karen Fann is among many leaders who say they have doubts about the election. This triggered the deeply compromised election “audit” of the state. Classes by a solidify without electoral experience belonging to a follower of “Stop the Steal” to start a random wild goose hunt inspired by savage plot theories that have no basis in reality. The effort is a huge waste of taxpayer resources – but serves as a cover to pass bills make voting more difficult. Two real independent audits already confirmed President Joe Biden’s victory in the state.

Republican elected officials, who have taken an oath to defend our democracy, pose a significant threat to our very system of government. We don’t just need to hold accountable the growing number of Republican public officials who are conspiracy theorists – we also need to condemn leaders who have turned a blind eye to hardline members of their party and those who use their lies. for political purposes. Our democracy cannot last if we do not have a common understanding of the challenges we face. No security measure can protect us from Republican lawmakers determined to use their power to undermine our democracy and spread lies.

Source link

]]> 0
Newsom and the state health department competition Wed, 09 Jun 2021 04:56:36 +0000

Following science turns many governors into the equivalent of carnival barkers.

But if the COVID-19 pandemic is a catastrophic public health event that has rocked the world putting the lives of 7.9 billion people at risk, why are our political leaders acting like they are peddling gambling to to vaccinate people?

And perhaps the most confusing of all is Gov. Gavin “Ed McMahon” Newsom.

All other governors using federal COVID relief funds to offer big prizes to boost vaccination rates are targeting those who have yet to receive their vaccines with million dollar incentive prizes.

The big prizes of Newsom’s “Vax for the Win” competition mainly benefit those who had already been vaccinated before its launch. Today, the state COVID lottery headquarters – better known as the California Department of Public Health – is sending the California State Lottery a list of random number identifiers of people previously vaccinated. The state lottery folks will then randomly select the ID numbers and send them back to the public health department. The health agency will then match the numbers with the names and contact the winners.

The process will be repeated on June 11 for 15 more Californians.

The big draw is on June 15 when 10 lucky Californians could get Newsom to do a publicity stunt for the editors’ compensation house by ringing a doorbell on the front door and surprising a previously vaccinated person with a fat. $ 1.5 million cardboard check with TV crews and media.

In fact, if you win, you can ask not to be publicly identified. Rest assured, however, that if you are okay with having your name released, Newsom’s political machine will use it to boost its popularity with the recall looming on the horizon.

In all fairness, the governor gives 2 million $ 50 grocery cards to the next 2 million people who get vaccinated.

It’s a little hard to poop the $ 50 grocery gift cards even if you have serious reservations about using them as motivation if it is indeed making people get vaccinated with COVID-19 to further reduce its threat. .

But rewarding people – 40 to be exact out of 17.2 million – who were already motivated to get vaccinated for their own health reasons or to protect others seems counterproductive because it will not increase the vaccination rate, except for those who have been vaccinated within three weeks. leading to the drawings. It sounds like a political coup to increase the governor’s popularity in the face of a recall.

It is questionable whether Newsom has committed any transgressions or a systemic leadership failure that warrants a recall, but now that such an election is held in advance, squirrel measures such as handing out 16 millions of dollars to people already vaccinated as part of a campaign to get the unvaccinated vaccinated for COVID-19 snapshots makes as much sense as using an Alaskan grizzly bear as a campaign prop.

The governor should get back to science and have a grown-up conversation with Californians and a grown-up debate with lawmakers.

The subject: Mandatory vaccinations.

Before someone sinks into the deep end, they need to be put in context.

The pandemic has been presented – and it could be done correctly – as an extreme and extraordinary public health crisis. Exhibit “A” is the death rate and the number of people whose health is compromised in the future after becoming ill with COVID. Exhibit “B” is the remedy to stop the spread that has essentially destroyed the economy.

Even if you think of yourself as an anti-vaccine, these two points aren’t exactly debatable.

Based on those two things alone, Sacramento’s elected leaders are arguably failing in their duty not to at least consider debating legislation to make vaccinations mandatory at least a requirement for schools.

If children are not vaccinated against a number of highly communicable diseases, the state does not encourage their parents to get them vaccinated with $ 50 gift cards to buy toys at Target or Walmart. Instead, the state allows them to go to public school where they can get an education that costs taxpayers over $ 150,000 over 13 years. Extremely narrow exceptions are made to allow certain young people not to be vaccinated.

The reason we are not having a debate is contrary to what the media – and the cesspool of insults on the Internet – suggest. Those who are reluctant to get vaccinated cannot be exclusively labeled as right-wing freaks, conspiracy theorists, die-hard Trump supporters, or prehistoric cavemen.

Instead, those who hesitate are from all political backgrounds, come from all ethnicities, and are a rainbow of socio-economic considerations.

Yes, those with a college education have a higher vaccination rate than those with a higher income, but it is nowhere near 100 percent.

The majority of unvaccinated people, especially in California, must be Democrats, Independents, and / or non-voters simply depending on how many remain. Could it be that mandatory vaccination is not on the table, as politicians on both sides of the aisle know that opposition is important and cuts across party lines?

Science shows that vaccinations reduce the ability to spread COVID. While not foolproof, they protect those who receive them from disease or the spread of the coronavirus, but they clearly make a difference.

In all likelihood, what will happen is that we will achieve an acceptable death rate, like with the flu, so that we can go about our business.

Speaking of the flu, you haven’t heard a single glance.

That’s because the protocols to fight COVID – face masks and reinforced disinfection procedures – have apparently caused a number of flu problems.

Documented cases have dropped 99% in the United States in the past year.

During the 2017-18 flu season, the Centers for Disease Control verified 959,000 hospitalizations and 61,099 flu deaths, including 600 children.

The number of pediatric deaths fell to 109 last season from the flu. This flu season, the United States has recorded only one child death from the flu.

Other viruses and bacteria have also been affected. Chickenpox, for example, is down two-thirds from pre-pandemic levels.

If we are to improve health, economic well-being, and – God forbid – actually reduce health care costs, our elected leaders must spend less time channeling Santa Claus and more time researching solutions. long term that have sticky power like adding COVID- 19 shots to the list of mandatory vaccines one must be enrolled in a public school.

Source link

]]> 0
A political history of the ACA Mon, 07 Jun 2021 19:46:45 +0000

One of the main messages of The ten years war, Jonathan Cohn’s excellent story of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), appears in the last chapter: “The Affordable Care Act is a very flawed, hopelessly compromised and woefully incomplete attempt to establish a fundamental right that already exists. in all other developed countries. It is also the most ambitious and important national legislation to pass in half a century, a big step towards a more perfect and more humane union as well. “

Cohn’s other key message, spelled out more succinctly in a March 22, 2021 article in the Atlantic (adapted from the book), is that the ACA became law because Democrats were willing to do the hard work of compromising and turning policy into legislation. It was not repealed because Republicans were unwilling or unable to do this job.

Cohn is well known to anyone following a health policy. A senior national correspondent at The HuffPost and former editor-in-chief at New Republic, he followed the ACA before its creation. He is an excellent writer and has written a very readable and informative book.

The ten years war is divided into three parts. The first describes past health care reform efforts, focusing on the failure of the Clinton plan. He also recounts the “Romneycare” health care reform in Massachusetts, which gave hope that bipartisan reform might be possible and provided a model for much of the ACA. Finally, he describes the 2008 presidential campaign, which laid the foundation for the ACA.

Part Two details the drafting and legislation of the ACA in the House and Senate from 2008 to 2010. Although Democrats held substantial majorities in both houses, including a majority of sixty votes in the Obstruction-proof in the Senate For some of that back then, Democrats ranged from moderate conservatives to single-payer liberals; mending a consensus bill was a huge effort that left no one completely satisfied. Additionally, a serious but ultimately unsuccessful effort was made to garner bipartisan support for the bill, delaying the process. The death of Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) early in this process made the job even more difficult, and the loss of the 60th Senate vote in early 2010 nearly destroyed the effort. But in March 2010, everything happened.

The third section deals with Republicans’ efforts to destroy the ACA from 2010 to 2017.The first two chapters of this section describe the two Supreme Court cases in which opponents tried to bring down the ACA. The first of these cases, National Federation of Independent Business c. Sebelius, upheld the individual mandate as a tax, but said mandatory Medicaid extensions were unconstitutional, leaving millions of low-income Americans uninsured in states that chose not to expand. The second case, King v. Burwell, found that the Federal Stock Exchange, or Marketplace, which existed in most states, could provide premium tax credits just like state scholarships and thus saved the premium subsidies, which were essential to the expansion of coverage.

Much of the remainder of Section Three deals with Republican efforts to repeal and replace the ACA. Cohn demonstrates that Republican efforts were doomed because it was clear that repealing the ACA’s coverage provisions would lead to a massive increase in the number of uninsured people, and Republicans had no plans for an alternative which would solve this problem. Republicans were determined to repeal Barack Obama’s signature, but had no “replacement” of their own.

The ten years war is indeed a political story. It details the Democratic political leaders who crafted the bill and the Republican politicians who attempted to destroy it, often recounting their health policy backgrounds and experiences with the health care system. It also describes the legislative and presidential assistants who did much of the work of developing and implementing the bill. Finally, it analyzes the legislative processes by which the ACA was adopted and nearly repealed.

The book has much less to say about the regulatory processes by which the ACA was implemented. It only briefly touches on the failure of the website in 2013 and the “if you love your health plan, you can keep it” fiasco, which resulted in the creation of “grandma” plans. Although it deals with the NFIB and King v. Burwell case, it says nothing about the many other cases that have been brought against the ACA and its regulations, including legal battles over contraceptive coverage, which still continue. In addition, it focuses almost exclusively on the Title I coverage and insurance provisions of the ACA and the Medicaid extension provisions of Title II. He says next to nothing about the remaining eight ACA titles, which have resulted in dramatic changes throughout America’s healthcare system. Finally, by limiting himself to the first ten years of the ACA, it fails to take into account the later major efforts of the Trump administration to undermine the ACA through executive action.

But attempting to cover all of these topics would have resulted in an unreadable length of book and would have clouded Cohn’s main theses on ACA politics. As it stands, Cohn has produced the most readable and comprehensive ACA story to date, a must read for anyone who wants to understand this story.

Source link

]]> 0
Protests against a Fudan campus in Budapest Sun, 06 Jun 2021 23:15:31 +0000


China wants to open university in Hungary, with money from Hungary paying for the privilege. June 5, approximately 10,000 protested in Budapest against the Fudan university campus project. China is said to be bribing the Hungarian leadership, and the Hungarian president has close ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The Hungarian people are right to rise up against any political leader compromised by the Beijing regime. The greatest danger to our democracies today is the risk that for a few dollars, China could buy presidents, foreign ministers and treasury officials to obey Beijing’s orders, rather than orders. voters.

The controversy in Budapest is indicative of a much larger struggle between democracy and dictatorship. In 2019, Fudan University removed references to “freedom of thought” from its charter. The expensive project, slated for completion in Budapest by 2024, will be funded by more than $ 1 billion in loans from China. Its price is higher than what the government spends on all other universities together, and will drain government funding from Hungarian higher education and increase Hungary’s indebtedness to China.

The Hungarian government is led by Viktor Orban and his supposedly right-wing party, Fidesz. But Orban has close ties with Beijing and Moscow, and pushes a foreign policy of “eastern opening”.

Huawei has 70 percent Hungarian telecommunications market, and Hungary buys a $ 15 billion nuclear power plant from Russia. This month alone, Orban’s government blocked a European Union statement against China’s abuses against Hong Kong. Its actions are those of a Trojan horse for Beijing and Moscow both within the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

A US official told EuroObserver in 2019 that Hungary’s “corruption problem creates avenues for Russian and Chinese influence.” He added, “One of the initiatives we will unveil is US support for efforts to take a closer look at the intersections between corruption and Russian and Chinese influence.

Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto claimed in 2019 that Western accusations of corruption by Beijing and Moscow in Hungary were hypocritical, given the deals with these illiberal regimes in Britain and Germany.

But Hungary has gone much further. According to Reuters, “Orban has forged cordial relations with China, Russia and other illiberal governments, while sticking together with Western allies by limiting the independence of scientific research, the judiciary and the media.” .

University student protesting against Fudan campus Told AFP last week, “Orban and Fidesz present themselves as anti-Communists, but in reality the Communists are their friends.”

Another told Reuters: “I do not agree with strengthening our country’s feudal relations with China.” He thinks the funds should go “to improving our own universities instead of building a Chinese one.”

The liberal mayor of Budapest and economists are against the campus proposed by Fudan, which is expensive and lacks transparency. Mayor Gergely Karácsony, who would be a better choice for the Hungarian Prime Minister, Told Reuters, “This Fudan project would challenge many of the values ​​Hungary committed to 30 years ago” when it gained independence from the Soviet Union.

The mayor labeled several streets, which converge on the proposed new campus, with names that commemorate the victims of Chinese Communism, including Dalai Lama Street, Free Hong Kong Road, Uyghur Martyrs’ Road, and one named after an imprisoned Chinese Catholic bishop.

A spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry said the name change should not affect the project and was “despicable”. At that time, he revealed exactly how the CCP views public opinion in a democracy.

About 66% of Hungarians oppose the Chinese university and 27% support the idea, according to an opinion poll released on June 1.

Documents leaked local journalists show that the $ 1.8 billion project, more than what Hungary spent on the entire higher education sector in 2019, will be funded by a Chinese loan of around $ 1.5 billion . The Fudan campus includes plans for 500 professors and 6,000 students, including in medicine and engineering, which raises questions about the transfer of technology from the EU to China.

A protester holds a sign that reads “Betrayal” during a protest against the Chinese Fudan University campus in Budapest, Hungary on June 5, 2021. (Bernadett Szabo / Reuters)

Orban already has a $ 2.1 billion Chinese loan to rebuild a Budapest-Belgrade railway line. He has accelerated a Chinese vaccine against the coronavirus which is still not approved in the European Union.

According to my sources, such Chinese projects can be accompanied by research fees of 2-7%, paid for by consultancy contracts in a way that personally benefits the head of state and his closest associates. If this is true for these projects, it could go as high as $ 275 million, which would explain why Hungarian political leaders are supporting the project.

In any case, Hungary becomes a CCP beachhead in the European Union. But the Hungarian people have been there, and have done it. The Hungarians experienced Soviet communism, including internment and labor camps, and rose up in 1956 to drive out the Russians. When the Soviets realized that the West feared war, they immediately returned and liquidated the anti-Communists.

Hungary then suffered under the yoke of Moscow until the country’s liberation in 1989. The Hungarians did not endure such horrors to easily fall under the yoke of a new Communist master, this time in Beijing instead. than in Moscow. But they and we will have to fight harder against Beijing’s corruption in our capitals if we are to guarantee our future freedoms.

Anders Corr holds a BA / MA in Political Science from Yale University (2001) and a PhD in Public Administration from Harvard University (2008). He is a director at Corr Analytics Inc., publisher of the Journal of Political Risk, and has conducted extensive research in North America, Europe and Asia. He is the author of “The Concentration of Power” (to be published in 2021) and of “No Trespassing” and has edited “Great Powers, Grand Strategies”.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Epoch Times.

Source link

]]> 0
A faint glimmer of hope is gone too – Journal Sun, 06 Jun 2021 01:31:42 +0000

With the faintest glimmers of hope for a change in the balance of power in the country with the disintegration of the PDM, the compromise policy of the compromised leaders of the main opposition parties has left an undisputed and dominant political actor.

You don’t get any points for guessing who it is. And in the current circumstances where, according to the Prime Minister and his Minister of Information, the media are completely free, I do not have to tell you as you already know.

After all, what good is a medium, especially if it is freer than in the West, as Imran Khan often tells us based on his “18 years of experience playing cricket and living in England”, if he leaves Pakistanis uninformed of what is going on at home?

However, in the unlikely event that you don’t know, don’t expect me to tell you. I am shamelessly humble; lacks the backbone that some of my journalist friends have displayed. They did so, well aware of the likely consequences: hardship for themselves and their dependents by being forced out of their jobs.

Not only the transgressors but also the “opposition” political parties will be brutally judged by history.

I can’t really afford to be unemployed. Or, to be more precise in my case, without a column. This column gives me the opportunity to struggle, to breathe in a stifling environment. Please don’t hate me to be honest it also helps me pay some of my bills. It is also very important.

Yes, important in a time like this when many journalists – who resist imposed authoritarianism disguised as patriotism and still believe that the will of the people must come first – often find themselves wishing to know how to update the donor / shipper ‘lifafa’ database.

What else would explain the case of the missing lifafa (envelopes full of cash), other than the current missing address of the recipient? Granted, hybrid-sponsored social media activists seem to know, are able to count, and go public with each case with the name of the recipient.

The “beneficiary” thus becomes a double loser. First, they face the insult of grappling with an individual, party or one or more foreign powers hostile to Pakistan, when they stand up for the rights of their own shirtless compatriots, the voiceless and then the “lifafa” is also lost on the way for them.

The term “twice loser” may not adequately describe such a miserable member of the Fourth Estate. I would say the three-time loser can be more specific. Yes, because between insults and forced unemployment, the most provocative will also be beaten, shot, and even killed.

It is also true that looking at the idiot box, one has the distinct impression that there is also no shortage of “co-opted journalists” who have fully embraced authoritarian values ​​and strive to regurgitate those who have not. shame every morning and evening, like a life affirming mantra.

And then there are those who can be compared to Nero playing the flute while Rome was on fire. Everyone will have to carry the cross of their own “brand” of journalism on their backs whenever the story is written or told. Rest assured that will be the case. It’s always like that.

Also, rest assured, not only the transgressors but also the “opposition” political parties will be brutally judged by history. For their compromises, the first of which is to accept as a given the ascendancy of a power which should not have a role in a constitutional democracy.

Many are disappointed with the way the PPP conducted its policy. The truth is that the PPP now seems to be reconciled with ruling Sindh and Sindh alone for the foreseeable future and therefore its ambitions are informed by this reality. He has Sindh.

Why should he let someone else proclaim “I have sinned” and jeopardize the freedom of senior leaders Asif Zardari and Feryal Talpur? If there was any doubt that the PPP put opportunity above all else, it disappeared in the manner of the notification of its candidate as leader of the opposition in the Senate.

It is not clear if this is the reason why the PDM forced the hand of the PPP the following month by demanding the resignation of its parliamentarians before the long planned march. What was clear was that this was not going to happen.

The party leadership has made this clear on several occasions since the formation of the PDM. The resurgent PPP will not tip the boat. He feels he has sacrificed enough for the cause of democracy. It was someone else’s turn to fight while enjoying the fruits of a deal or “dheel” as some observers say.

One would have thought that the final battle whenever this happened would have been decided in central Punjab with Nawaz Sharif’s October 2019 Gujranwala story providing the required street support and any gaps being filled by JUI cadres. -F.

Enter Shehbaz Sharif. Released on bail on his own terms after “one day less than seven months” in jail. Looks like he likes his freedom too and looks like the leader of the PML-N who kept more than 50,000 supporters away from Lahore airport.

He did not want a confrontation that would pit PML-N supporters against the state when his brother and niece were arrested on arrival before the 2018 election and sent to prison. They had been found guilty of clearly spurious charges. Some have said he did it for a bigger cause: he was promised Punjab after the elections.

It didn’t have to be. But his faith is intact. He says he’s avoiding confrontation because the country can’t afford it. Agreed. He dreams of a new social contract with free and fair elections after electoral reforms, where all institutions remain within their constitutional framework, the judiciary is independent and free from all influences and the popular will prevails.

Without a word on his proposals from the main arbitrators, or even a clue that will be the guarantor of such an arrangement, he either fell in love with what the (current) “good cop” whispered in his ear, or preferred to be the modern male reincarnation of Alice in Wonderland.

The writer is a former editor of Dawn.

Posted in Dawn, June 6, 2021

Source link

]]> 0
Mason County Property Transfers | Independent Ledger – Maysville Online Sat, 05 Jun 2021 14:58:34 +0000

On June 1, Judge Kim Leet Razor presided over:

Bruce R. Crooker, 31, third degree criminal trespass, fined $ 50 plus court costs.

Quenten M. Greene, 19, failing to maintain six-month diversionary insurance guilty, violating traffic control device guilty of $ 50 fine, failing to wear seat belt guilty of ” $ 25 fine, operating with suspended / revoked license guilty of serving 30 days, parole.

Brandy Howland, 36, robbery illegally taking over $ 500 laid off, first offense of unauthorized use of motor vehicle, summons July 7.

Kevin W. Jolley, 55, obstructed vision / dismissed windshield, dismissed insurance breach.

Millie Jolley, 34, third degree criminal trespassing, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Millie Jolley, 34, operating with suspended / revoked license, license to be in possession, failure to produce insurance card, failure to maintain insurance, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Millie L. Jolley, 34, une / expired license plates, une / expired Kentucky registration receipt, operating on suspended / revoked license, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Sylvia Lieb, 72, speeding 20 miles over limit in school zone, failing to show up, warn DOT.

Jesse Ray Lykins, 55, failure to show insurance card guilty of a fine of $ 50, failure to wear seatbelt rejected.

George W. Mitchell, 42, suspended / revoked license operator guilty 60 days serving conditional discharge, failure to purchase insurance terminated with proof, possession of marijuana, guilty, serving 30 days conditional discharge.

Alisha R. Montgomery, 32, suspended / revoked license, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Wilburn D. Richmond, 49, theft by deception under $ 500, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Hubert L. Riley, 21, possession of marijuana, guilty, serving a 30-day parole.

Dawayne E. Sartin, 45, operating under suspended / revoked license, failure to maintain insurance, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Vernon A. Sinclair, 44, operating on suspended / revoked license, fired with proof.

Kyle M. Tschaenn, 25, suspended / revoked license, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Kyle M. Tschaenn, 25, speeding 19 miles over limit, operating with suspended / revoked license, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Kyle Mitchell Tschaenn, 25, speeding 15 miles over limit, failing to purchase insurance, failing to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Kyle Mitchell Tschaenn, 25, failure to maintain insurance, failure to register motor vehicle transfer, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Malcolm Elliott, 38, theft by illegal taking under $ 500, pre-trial conference June 21.

Malcolm L. Elliott, 38, third degree criminal trespassing, pre-trial conference June 21.

Logan Earl Gordley, 34, seat belt failure, license suspended / revoked, Kentucky registration receipt not / expired, license plates not / expired, insurance breach, non- production of insurance cards, failure to notify DOT of address change, pre-trial conference July 7.

Wesley R. Huber, 33, two counts of theft by illegal taking under $ 500, pre-trial conference June 16.

Erica Huff, 30, first degree possession of controlled substances, first offense, drug paraphernalia, pre-hearing conference July 7.

Jason Wayne Kielman, 42, alcohol poisoning in public place first and second offense, fined $ 25, third degree criminal mischief, guilty of 30 days conditional discharge.

Cassie M. King, 28, endangering the well-being of a minor, pre-trial conference July 7.

Tanner Keith Lykins, 34, public controlled substance poisoning, failure to appear, arrest warrant issued.

Mekenzie McCain, 23, endangering the welfare of a second-degree juvenile, pre-trial conference June 21.

Charles McHugh, 60, second degree burglary attempt, pre-hearing conference June 16.

Michael Moore, first-degree strangulation rejected, fourth-degree dating violence, pre-trial conference July 7.

Cameron Tyler Muse, 22, possession of open can of alcohol in vehicle, two counts of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, pre-trial conference June 16.

Myrtle Noel, 25, first third degree controlled substance trafficking offense, possession of marijuana, pre-hearing conference June 16.

Leticia Prather, 61, fourth degree assault domestic violence minor injury, pre-trial conference July 7.

Jamon T. Turner, 22, speeding 25 miles, no operator license, first third degree controlled substance trafficking offense, trafficking in marijuana over five pounds, trafficking in marijuana under eight ounces , pre-trial conference on June 21.

Benjamin Faul, 43, convicted of possession of a handgun, first offense of trafficking in first degree controlled substances, possession of marijuana, first offense of possession of first degree controlled substances, preliminary hearing June 16.

Sierra Purcell, 27, receiving stolen goods under $ 10,000, tampering with physical evidence, linked to grand jury.

Sierra Purcell, 27, motor vehicle transfer non-registration, unexpired / unexpired Kentucky registration receipt, both rejected.

Adam Ritchie, 39, theft by illegal taking under $ 10,000, criminal mischief in the first degree, leaving the scene of the accident, linked to the grand jury.

Ian Nathaniel Rutherford, 39, first degree possession of controlled substances first offense, bound to grand jury.

Source link

]]> 0
Monthly review | “Can the working class change the world? A Bold Call for the Reorganization of the World Working Class (Global Labor Journal) Fri, 04 Jun 2021 21:23:50 +0000

Can the working class change the world?
218 pages, $ 19 per pack, ISBN 9781583677100
Through Michael D. Yates

Reviewed by Fathimah Fildzah Izzati for World Labor Journal

… The question of reproductive work, heavily occupied by women, is also highlighted in this story. It is crucial to point out that reproductive work, including social reproductive work, tends to be ignored in social studies in general. Yates also elaborates on the gender pay gap, sexual harassment and other threats in the workplace and their importance to workers. This reviewer argues that his elaboration on this problem constitutes an essential contribution to the pioneering field of research of Federici (2012), Bhattacharya (2017) and others. Another often overlooked problem – work-related mental health problems – is discussed separately in Chapter 4 of the book (p. 91).

… In Chapter 2, Yates develops the theories of labor exploitation from a Marxist point of view. It provides the fundamental knowledge workers need to organize resistance in a very concise way – for example, the elaboration of major theoretical concepts such as capitalism, the exploitation of wage labor, racism, patriarchy, colonialism and the imperialism, and how these social relations affect workers. “Conditions on a global scale. He argues that women, “especially those who were poor, never stopped working for wages” (p. 54). On imperialism, Yates notes that “the world market, always rewarding those with the most economic power, has channeled the profits of what we now call the Global South to the Global North” (p. 51) and that “capitalism since its” (p. 47), “especially in the Americas and in Europe” (p. 64).

Chapters 3 and 4 contain a discussion of the importance of trade unions and labor movements as well as the important challenges facing the working class today. Unions, Yates points out, “have played a pivotal role in forcing employers to provide workplaces that are safe, free from injury and health hazards” (p. 89). However, he argues that the engagement of labor movements in politics is essential since “the state, at all levels, is closely tied to capital, the main adversary of labor” (p. 99). From this perspective, history indeed shows the many significant changes in public policies that have resulted from the engagement between labor movements and politics. The cases of Sweden and the United Kingdom (UK) are provided as examples. The Labor Party in the UK, for example, has succeeded in nationalizing “certain industries like coal and steel, and created a modern welfare state, including the National Health Service. [NHS]”(P.102). Yates argues that the NHS, a free public health service, is a remarkable achievement in the engagement between labor movements and politics. In short, the traditional function of the unions is no longer sufficient to tackle the program of transformation of the working class today.

In addition, the working class faces alienation and individualization, which threatens the unity of workers as a class (p. 76; Keating, Rasmussen & Rishi, 2010). Capitalism, Yates writes, “has radically transformed class society” (p. 65) because it is involved in all aspects of human life, including in the workplace. In earlier forms of capitalism, he argues, “workers simply carried out orders” (p. 69). Today, alienation penetrates more deeply into the lives of workers and, as a result, affects the organization and unionization of workers, despite the countless efforts to organize unions around the world (Chun, 2008; Pratap, 2014 ; Izzati, 2020). The precarious conditions of the working class, as Yates explains in Chapter 1, also affect the unionization of workers. In these conditions, he notes that “it is difficult to form unions or engage in political action” (p. 107). The racial and patriarchal nature of capitalism has also “generated fundamental scissions in the working class” (p. 80), while the unity of the working class and the solidarity within it is crucial in the labor movements.

In Chapter 5, Yates points out that neoliberalism poses significant challenges for unions. As Yates noted, there are some regressive aspects of unions. Some unions “are bureaucratic, with undemocratic chains of command. Their leaders assume many pitfalls – expensive homes and cars, oversized expense accounts, private schools for their children, and more. – of their class enemy ”(p. 123). These notions remind this reviewer of some Indonesian unions that share the same characteristics (TD et al., 2015). These unions tend to undermine the workers’ struggle and have challenged the class struggle itself (TD et al., 2015).

All along Can the working class change the world? Yates demonstrates that “capitalism is a system of austere individualism” (p. 140). According to him, only radical thought and action “has a chance to avoid accelerating levels of barbarism” (p. 184). Therefore, in the latter part of the book, Yates offers suggestions on what organizations can do in the class struggle, pointing out that “the ‘I’ must be removed and the ‘we’ must be put forward” (p . 140).

Arguing that the working class “must have at least a general idea of ​​the world in which we want to live and how to go about making such a place exist” (pp. 141-142), Yates criticizes certain destructive tendencies of social movements, including labor movements, such as liberal feminism and compromised non-governmental organizations, among others. He stresses that all movements and organizations must engage in class struggles (p. 145). Can the working class change the world? is a bold call for the reorganization of the world working class to overcome its living conditions through collective action. Thus, this journal recommends the book as required reading for academics, students and union activists who seek fundamental analysis in today’s labor movements….

You can read the full review at World Labor Journal

Source link

]]> 0
Now is the time to invest more globally? Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:31:54 +0000

Important information: The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, so you can get back less than what you invested.

Revisions to economic growth forecasts have come en masse and quickly this year, suggesting that there remains significant uncertainty about the global outlook. The task was exceptionally difficult. Forecasters were required to consider not only each country’s rebound potential based on longer-term fundamentals, but also Covid-19 cases and vaccination rates.

The latest revisions came this week from the OECD. With global economic activity already back to pre-pandemic levels, growth is now expected to reach 5.8% this year, well above the 4.2% projected in December. Among the world’s major nations, the United States and China are expected to lead with growth of 6.9% and 8.5% respectively1.

The OECD warns, however, that the recovery will be uneven, due to the risk of new coronavirus outbreaks with much of the world’s population not yet vaccinated. Among the world’s leading economies, Japan stands out in this regard, with only 2.6% growth expected this year.2.

From an investment perspective, a degree of uncertainty often creates opportunities. An important task this year, like any other, is to identify where attractive growth opportunities intersect with overly pessimistic expectations.

The last few years have shown that opportunities can arise in relatively unexpected places. In 2019, Greece stood out. Last year, Vietnam, South Korea and Denmark – the latter with its recession-resistant healthcare and pharmaceutical companies – were among the best places to be.3.

As the small group of tech stocks that led the S&P 500 higher for much of 2020 has shown, owning the right stocks can be just as important as investing in the right market. Investing globally effectively expands the network, allowing investors to gain exposure to the best companies, no matter where they are located. With the UK representing less than 4% of the MSCI World Index, it is statistically unlikely that most world leaders are British.4.

Japanese automakers already have a huge lead in hybrid and all-electric vehicle technologies, and we’ve all heard of Tesla and its remarkable share price history. However, amid booming electric passenger vehicle sales in China, it was Chinese automaker NIO that stole the show in 2020 as one of the world’s top-performing stocks.5.

So far in 2021, European markets have been shining, although Europe has fallen behind in vaccine deployment and the OECD assessment that much of the region could take another year to rebound . This does not seem to have deterred investors looking for a good deal. Even after their recent big gains, European companies are trading at a discount of around 19% to their US counterparts based on the amounts that companies in both regions are expected to earn over the next year.6.

Still, a number of European companies have world-class brands that should be doing well as consumers look to roll out the savings they’ve built up in 2020. Demand from fashion-conscious shoppers in developed and emerging markets for European luxury goods already seems to be rebounding. . LVMH (Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy) says sales of its leather goods business increased 37% in the first quarter compared to the same period (before the pandemic) in 20197.

Emerging and frontier markets are trickier. Dispersed populations and compromised logistics in some cases count against the smooth deployment of vaccines and the OECD expects economic recovery to be delayed as a result. In addition, countries deemed to have handled the coronavirus well – such as China, Taiwan and South Korea – have already seen their stock markets recover sharply.

Source link

]]> 0
Largest meat producer comes back online after cyberattack | Michigan News Wed, 02 Jun 2021 22:36:00 +0000

By DEE-ANN DURBIN and FRANK BAJAK, Associate Press Editors

DETROIT (AP) – The world’s largest meat processing company has resumed most of its production after a weekend cyber attack, but experts say the vulnerabilities exposed by this attack and others are far from be resolved.

In a statement released Wednesday evening, the FBI attributed the attack on Brazilian meat processor JBS SA to REvil, a Russian-speaking gang that made some of the largest ransomware demands on record in recent months. The FBI has said it will work to bring the group to justice and urged anyone who has suffered a cyberattack to contact the office immediately.

REvil hasn’t posted anything about the hack on its dark website. But this is not unusual. Typically, ransomware syndicates do not release information about attacks when they are in initial negotiations with victims – or if victims have paid a ransom.

In October, a REvil representative calling himself “UNKN” said in an interview posted online that the agricultural sector would now be a primary target for the union. REvil also threatened to auction off sensitive stolen data from victims who refused to pay for it.

Political cartoons about world leaders

Political cartoons

The attack targeted servers supporting JBS operations in North America and Australia. Backup servers were not affected and the company said it was not aware of any compromised customer, vendor, or employee data.

JBS said Wednesday evening that it plans to resume production at all of its factories on Thursday and operate at “near full capacity” in all of its global operations.

It is not known if JBS paid a ransom. The company has not discussed it in public statements and did not respond to telephone and email messages on Wednesday seeking comment.

The FBI and the White House declined to comment on the ransom. White House press secretary Jen Psaki said on Wednesday that the United States is considering all options to deal with the attack and that President Joe Biden intends to confront Russian leader Vladimir Putin , about his country being home to ransomware criminals when the two meet in Europe in two weeks.

“I can assure you that we are raising this issue at the highest levels of the US government,” she said. “The president certainly believes that President Putin has a role to play in stopping and preventing these attacks. “

While there is no evidence that Russia benefits financially from the crime of ransomware – which hit healthcare, education, and state and local governments particularly hard during the pandemic – U.S. officials say its practitioners have sometimes worked for the Kremlin security services.

Ransomware expert Allan Liska from cybersecurity firm Recorded Future said JBS is the largest food maker yet to be hit by ransomware, in which hackers cripple entire networks by scrambling their data. But he said at least 40 food companies have been targeted by ransomware gangs in the past year, including brewer Molson Coors and E&J Gallo Winery.

Food companies, Liska said, are “at about the same level of safety as manufacturing and shipping. That is to say not very.

The attack was the second in a month against critical US infrastructure. Earlier in May, hackers suspected of operating with impunity in Russia and allied states halted operation of the Colonial Pipeline, America’s largest pipeline, for nearly a week. The closure sparked long queues and panic shopping at gas stations in the southeast. Colonial Pipeline confirmed that it paid the hackers $ 4.4 million, who then handed over a software decryption key.

Cyber ​​security experts have said the attacks targeting critical sectors of the U.S. economy are proof the industry has failed to take years of repeated warnings seriously.

Cybercriminals previously active in online identity theft and bank fraud switched to ransomware in the mid-2010s, as programmers developed sophisticated programs that allowed the software to be distributed more effectively.

The ransomware scourge reached epidemic dimensions last year. The CrowdStrike company observed more than 1,400 ransomware and data extortion incidents in 2020. Most of the targeted manufacturing, industry, engineering and technology companies, said Adam Meyers, senior vice president of business intelligence.

“The problem has gotten out of hand,” said John Hultquist, who heads intelligence analysis at FireEye. “We are already in a vicious circle.

Hultquist said ransomware syndicates are tackling more critical and visible targets because they have invested heavily in identifying “whales” – companies they believe will pay large ransoms.

JBS is the second largest producer of beef, pork and chicken in the United States. to Trey Malone, assistant professor of agriculture at Michigan State University.

Mark Jordan, who follows the meat industry as executive director of Leap Market Analytics, said the disruption to the food supply would likely be minimal in this case. The meat has about 14 days to travel to the market, he said. If a factory is closed for a day or two, companies can usually make up for lost production with additional shifts.

“Several factories owned by a major meat packer that go offline for a few days are a major headache, but this is manageable assuming it doesn’t extend much beyond that,” he said. .

Jordan said a one-week shutdown would be more serious, especially for a company like JBS, which controls about a fifth of the country’s beef, pork and chicken supply.

Critical infrastructures in the United States could be better protected against ransomware attacks without the 2012 defeat of legislation that would have set cybersecurity standards for critical industries.

The US Chamber of Commerce and other business groups lobbied against the bill, condemning it as government interference in the free market. Even a watered-down version that would have made the standards voluntary was blocked by a Republican filibuster in the Senate.

Right now, the United States has no cybersecurity requirements for businesses outside of power, nuclear, and banking, said David White, president of cyber risk management firm Axio.

White said regulations would be helpful, especially for companies with inadequate or immature cybersecurity programs. These rules should be sector specific and should take into account national economic risks of blackouts, he said.

But he said regulations can also have an unintended negative effect. Some companies might see them as the cap – not the starting point – of how they should manage risk, he said.

“Summary: Regulation can help, but it’s not a panacea,” White said.

JBS factories in Australia resumed their limited operations in New South Wales and Victoria on Wednesday, Agriculture Minister David Littleproud said. The company was hoping to return to work in Queensland state on Thursday, he said.

JBS, which is the majority shareholder of Pilgrim’s Pride, did not say which of its 84 U.S. facilities were closed on Monday and Tuesday due to the attack. He said JBS USA and Pilgrim’s were able to ship meat from almost any facility on Tuesday. Several of the company’s pork, poultry and prepared food plants were operational on Tuesday and its Canadian beef plant resumed production, he said.

Plant closures reflect the reality that modern meat processing is highly automated, both for food safety and worker safety reasons. Computers collect data at several stages of the production process; ordering, billing, shipping and other functions are all electronic.

Bajak reported from Boston. AP screenwriters Rod McGuirk in Canberra, Australia; Alan Suderman in Richmond, Virginia; and Nancy Benac, Eric Tucker and Alexandra Jaffe in Washington contributed to this report.

Copyright 2021 The Associated press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source link

]]> 0
Thanet’s council examines huge legal costs of £ 733,000 for pending disciplinary and grievance cases – with £ 247,000 already paid Wed, 02 Jun 2021 09:00:00 +0000

Thanet’s advice

Members of Thanet’s council cabinet are being asked to approve a whopping £ 697,000-733,000 to pay for legal fees due to ongoing disciplinary and grievance proceedings with the authority.

A law firm was hired in March 2020 to provide governance support and costs have been estimated at £ 40,000. In July 2020, that estimate was revised to £ 50,000, but it has now been revealed that the CFO is reporting costs incurred through to completion. of May 2021 regarding ongoing disciplinary and grievance proceedings already total £ 247,000. Of this, £ 141,515 relates specifically to 2020-2021.

A report to members of the Cabinet indicates that potential future costs are estimated to be between £ 450,000 and £ 486,000, resulting in estimated total legal costs of between £ 697,000 and £ 733,000.

Of the costs incurred to date, £ 114,000 relates to overall process management, £ 111,000 for internal processes under the control of the board and £ 22,000 for external employment tribunals.

Anticipated / potential future costs are split between £ 78,000 for concluding internal Thanet Board processes and £ 408,000 for external employment tribunals.

Grievances and disciplinary proceedings

There have been numerous inquiries into staff grievances and disciplinary processes handled by the Board’s Investigation and Discipline Subcommittee (IDSC).

It is understood that the authority is currently investigating complaints and counter-complaints involving the four members of the management team – CEO Madeline Homer, Gavin Waite, Tim Willis and chief oversight officer Tim Howes, who has been suspended from his duties since last December.

Mr Willis was also suspended in 2019, but was subsequently cleared of all allegations.

There is at least one staff grievance that has been dragging on since 2019 and is still unresolved.

“Governance failures”

Last September, the need for a ‘top-down’ governance and culture review was underscored in a report from the head of the East Kent Internal Audit Partnership, saying that ‘action is needed on the board of Thanet District to address cultural and governance failures that arise from the highest level of the organization.

The call came from the head of the partnership, Christine Parker, in a letter to the chair and vice chair of the authority’s governance committee.

Ms. Parker highlighted concerns about relationships with senior officers and “fuzzy reporting lines” as well as the issue of unsuccessful grievance procedures.

She said the cases in the public domain included findings from an independent investigator that “there was evidence of intimidation and harassment of staff by some of the most senior staff within the organization”.


Two complaints were filed by TDC staff against senior officers in 2019.

One of those complainants named both General Manager Madeline Homer and Director of Operational Services Gavin Waite in a list of 10 grievances.

Last year, the employment grievance process prompted the GMB union to ask Thanet’s board to implement a new independent system to deal with complaints of bullying and harassment against senior executives, claiming that current methods are “compromised beyond further use”.

Earlier this year, the protracted grievances procedures were accused of delaying an “urgent” review of the culture within the authority.

Then-governance and audit committee chairman Mike Garner said the review needed to be “prioritized.”

But the review cannot take place until investigations into staff grievances and disciplinary processes handled by the Subcommittee on Investigation and Discipline (IDSC) are concluded, as it is said that this would result in an overlap and mean that some issues could not be discussed openly.

Cabinet approval required

The issue of significant legal fees is brought to Cabinet members on 8 June, as Cabinet approval must be sought for all budgets over £ 50,000.

A report to Cabinet members states: “The law firm that oversees and manages these processes was selected because of its particular expertise in dealing with employment issues in constitutional and local governments and because the case could not be managed internally due to perceived conflicts of interest. interest.”

The report also highlights the difficulty of finding funding due to the depletion of reserves.

He says, “The board’s finances are in a delicate position, even before the pandemic our reserves were relatively low and we used to not meet savings or income targets.

“The impact of the Covid pandemic is expected to put more pressure on the Council’s finances, the extent of this situation will only be known when the year-end position is finalized and this will be reported to Cabinet on July 29, 2021. As such, at this time it is not possible to clarify exactly what will be the exact source of funding of the £ 247,000 for costs to date, but this will inevitably have to be funded from our earmarked reserves. limited.

“It will be a difficult task to identify what funding is available, especially in light of the requirement to allocate £ 3million of earmarked reserves by 2020-2021 to address the financial impact of Covid.

“To comply with applicable accounting standards, it will be necessary to create a provision in the 2020-2021 accounts to fully cover planned future expenses. Therefore, total planned costs of £ 733,000 will need to be recognized and re-funded from our reserves in 2020-2021. “

The report adds that £ 247,000 ‘must be approved’ in retrospect as the funds have already been disbursed.


Source link

]]> 0