Conservative group alleges sweeping government cover-up over Joe Biden’s dogs

In recent years, the conservative Judicial Watch group, along with many right-wing Republicans, have devoted countless hours to an attempt at dismantling. Joe and Hunter Biden for alleged crimes that took place abroad. Filing at least a dozen lawsuits and “dozens of Freedom of Information Act requests,” the organization, which has spent years torturing Bill and Hillary Clinton by “Tapis-bombe[ing] federal courts, ” mentionned as recently as last month that he was “working hard to get more information on the Biden family scandals.” Unfortunately, so far their efforts have yielded little concrete information implicating the president or his son. And so, the group apparently decided to extend their investigation to other members of the Biden family. Specifically, Field and Major Biden. Yes, the President’s dogs. No, this is not a joke.

In a press release issued Tuesday, Judicial Watch ad that he had taken legal action against the US Department of Homeland Security for “communications between Secret Service officials assigned to the White House regarding the Biden family dogs.” The complaint was lodged after the Secret Service, which Judicial Watch said has nothing better to do, “failed to process the cases in a timely manner in response to a FOIA request from March 10, 2021.” This request was aimed at “All records of communications between USSS officials responsible for protection at the White House regarding the Biden family dogs, named Champ and Major,” and was apparently inspired by the news that Major had suffocated two people in the White House. In a statement, the president of Judicial Watch Tom fitton said, “The public has a right to know the details of any incident in which Secret Service personnel were injured by President Biden’s dog. We have no doubts that Major and Champ are good dogs, but politicians and bureaucrats cannot be trusted. Seriously.

Last month Major was fired for a second round training after biting the hand of a Secret Service agent in March and then of a National Park Service employee in April. It’s unclear exactly what Judicial Watch thinks they can find out from this waste of no taxpayer money at all, but strong possibilities likely include:

• Emails showing Champ received $ 100,000 from a lobbying firm working on behalf of Big Kibble
• A cover-up by White House communications personnel regarding a Washington post story he killed about the two dogs not letting their assigned Secret Service agents use their toilet
• A major multi-year approval agreement signed with Pup-Peroni three days after the inauguration, although it is illegal for first pets to take advantage of the presidency
• Evidence indicating Major’s involvement in Hunter Biden’s relationship with Burisma
• A sex scandal

At the end of April, the Bidens ad that they will soon add a cat to the first family. But where does this cat come from? What skeletons are in his closet? Hopefully Judicial Watch will take care of this as well.

In other news from Giuliani

The guy could apparently use the money, but his notoriously cheap buddy did not offer to cough, by The New York Times:

As a federal inquiry into Rudolph W. Giuliani intensifies, his advisers pressured the former president Donald J. Trump to achieve a $ 250 million war chest to pay Mr. Giuliani for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results on behalf of Mr. Trump. Pressure from Mr. Giuliani’s camp has intensified since FBI agents executed search warrants at Mr. Giuliani’s home and office last week, according to people familiar with the discussions, and then intervenes. that Mr. Giuliani has hired new lawyers and faces his own backward – and costly – legal battles.

“I want to know what the GOP did with the quarter of the $ 1 billion they raised for the electoral legal struggle,” Bernard Kerik, the former New York Police Commissioner, wrote on Twitter Sunday. Mr. Giuliani appointed Mr. Kerik when he was mayor of New York. Using curse words, Mr Kerik added that “lawyers and law firms that didn’t do” a lot of work were paid well, while those who worked hard “got nothing.”