The FBI knew as early as December 2019 that Hunter Biden believed the Russians had stolen his laptop, which he said left him vulnerable to blackmail due to compromising evidence on the laptop combined with his father’s presidential ambitions. This explosive revelation establishes that either Joe Biden lied to the American public or the intelligence community lied to him.
When the New York Post went public in October 2020 with videos, texts and emails from an abandoned MacBook laptop belonging to Hunter Biden, Joe Biden told Americans the laptop was a Russian hoax. .
But now Brian Della Rocca, a lawyer representing John Paul Mac Isaac, told me that video of Hunter Biden telling a prostitute he thought the Russians had stolen a second laptop, leaving him vulnerable to blackmail, was “Permanently on the hard drive” of the abandoned MacBook Biden in Isaac’s store and later seized by the FBI.
This new revelation establishes that, as of December 2019, the FBI knew that a second laptop computer had been stolen from Hunter Biden and that this laptop contained material that made the Biden family a national security risk and subject to influence. Russian.
Joe Biden surely received briefings on these risks long before his October 2020 denial of the laptop’s authenticity, so the question is: Didn’t the FBI provide Biden with a truthful briefing on this information, or did Biden fail to equalize voters?
A week ago today, the Daily Mail published “Uncovered footage” of a naked Hunter Biden telling a prostitute that “Russians have videos of me having crazy sex!” According to The Daily Mail, “After filming himself sleeping with the woman using his laptop in January 2019, Hunter left the camera rolling as he recounted a Vegas bender he had in spent “18 days going from a penthouse suite to a penthouse suite”, sometimes costing $ 10,000 a night.
The video continued with Hunter recounting how he nearly overdosed in the summer of 2018 while partying in Las Vegas with his drug dealer and two other guys. According to the president’s son, after regaining consciousness, “there was this 35-year-old Russian, really nice, pure brunette,” Hunter explained. Soon after, Hunter discovered that his laptop was missing.
“I think he was the one who stole my computer,” Hunter explains on the tape. âI think of the three of them, the three guys who were like a little group. The dealer and his two guys, I took them everywhere, âexplained Hunter. âThey have videos of me doing this. They have videos of me having crazy fucking sex, you know, âHunter added. “My computer, I had taken tons of it, I stayed like that camera on,” Hunter continued, “and someone stole it during that time.”
The prostitute then asked Hunter if he was worried that the Russian thieves were trying to ‘blackmail’ him. “Yeah, in a way, yeah,” Hunter replied, noting that his dad “is running for president” and “I talk about it all the time.”
In its briefing last Wednesday, the Daily Mail omitted any mention of the source of the video, but The Federalist has now confirmed that the blackmail video was contained on the hard drive of the abandoned Hunter Biden MacBook in a Delaware repair shop. , The Mac. Boutique, Inc.
After this MacBook was abandoned, Isaac informed the FBI of its existence. FBI agents later grasped Isaac’s computer in December 2019, but by then Isaac had already made a copy of the hard drive.
Isaac then provided a copy of the hard drive to Robert Costello, who at the time was a lawyer for former mayor Rudy Giuliani. In October 2020, Giuliani provided a reader’s copy to the New York Post, which broadcast several stories on details revealed in emails, texts and videos, including evidence of a pay-to-play scandal involving Joe Biden.
When the Post broke the story the month before the 2020 presidential election, other media covered the Democratic candidate, with Twitter misrepresenting the Post and preventing users from sharing the story.
As the corrupt media obscured the story, in the last presidential debate before the election, President Trump confronted Biden with the details revealed by the MacBook, calling him “the laptop of hell”:
[Y]You got a lot of money from Russia. They were paying you a lot of money, and they probably still are. But now, with what came out today, it’s even worse. All the e-mails, e-mails, horrible e-mails of the kind of money you and your family were making. And Joe, you were vice president when it was happening, and it never should have happened. And I think you owe the American people an explanation.
After denying any impropriety on his part or that of his son, Biden responded telling the American public:
There are 50 former national intelligence officers who said he was accusing me of a Russian factory. They said that has all the … five former CIA chiefs, both sides say what he’s saying is a pile of garbage. No one believes it except him and his good friend, Rudy Giuliani.
When Trump responded by asking Biden if he was saying that “the laptop is now another hoax from Russia, Russia, Russia?” Biden said: “This is exactly what [I] has been said. “
By the time Biden told voters in October 2020 that he had been told the laptop was another Russian hoax, what the FBI or the intelligence community would likely have told Biden was unknown. However, the revelation that, as of December 2019, the FBI had a copy of the video showing Hunter saying that Russians had stolen his laptop, and that the laptop contained sex videos that put him in danger of blackmail due to his father’s plans to run for president change the color of things.
This new detail means the FBI was aware, not only of the existence of the MacBook with compromising videos and damaging Joe Biden emails and texts, but that there was a second laptop missing, presumably with similar information, which had been stolen from Hunter and suspected to be in the possession of Russians. The FBI would also know that Hunter had spoken of his father’s presidential ambitions “all the time” and considered himself a potential target for blackmail.
It is inconceivable that the FBI or all of the American intelligence agencies did not immediately inform candidate Biden of the situation. In the run-up to the 2016 election, the FBI and the intelligence community naturally provided defense briefings to the Clinton and Trump campaigns. Surprisingly, the FBI used one of these intelligence briefings to spy on Donald Trump based on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation launched on the basis of unverified gossip.
Specifically, on August 17, 2016, as part of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into the Trump campaign, FBI agent Joe Pientka was asked to brief Trump, Michael Flynn and Chris Christie in a two-person meeting. hours warning the foreign intelligence team. threats. âAs the Federalist’s Sean Davis previously reported, declassified information would later be established that Pientka had beenâ selected to attend on behalf of the FBI so that he could ârecordâ or âhearâ any kind of ‘admission “from Trump, Flynn or Christie that they colluded with the Russian government to steal the election from Hillary Clinton.
Even though the FBI hadn’t launched a more substantiated investigation into “The Big Guy” based on concrete evidence on the MacBook indicating an illegal payment-to-gamble deal involving the then-vice president who was running for office at the time. presidential election, a defensive briefing to Biden on the risk of Russian blackmail based on Hunter’s stolen second laptop would be indispensable to our national security interests.
In Trump’s case, the FBI would also later have insist just months after first receiving the unverified and now debunked Steele dossier that an intelligence community assessment included details of memoranda from a former MI6 officer that claimed the Russians had ‘compromised’ on Trump .
However, because James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, and John Brennan, the former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, objected to the inclusion of the Steele dossier reports in the text of the assessment of the intelligence community, it was instead included as a separate “appendix”, which then FBI Director James Comey subsequently added. informed Trump in person.
While Comey claimed he told Trump about the dirty “news” because the press had the information and expected it to be released soon, it’s the CNN leak of the briefing itself which provided a “news” hook for the record, which resulted in its full publication shortly thereafter.
Unlike the unverified Steele file, here the FBI had a MacBook portable Containing a Biden Foundation sticker and photographs, videos, emails and text, making it easy to confirm the authenticity of the source information. And on that laptop, there was a video of Hunter stating that he believed the Russians had a second laptop of his own that contained equally compromising material, which created a risk of blackmail given the upcoming presidential race. Joe Biden.
Certainly, proof that the Russians had an authentic “kompromat” on the Biden family would make both a written intelligence briefing and an in-person briefing to Elder Biden essential. In fact, shortly after The Post published its first article covering the material on the MacBook, an anonymous “person familiar with the matter” Recount USA Today that “at least in part” a federal investigation was underway into the MacBook “to determine whether Russia has set its sights on a familiar target: Biden’s father, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden” .
“Federal authorities,” the source said, were also “investigating whether the material provided to the Post by Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, is part of a smoke bomb of disinformation pushed by Russia”. There is no evidence, however, that the material on the hard drive is “disinformation,” leaving open a serious question: Did the FBI lie to Biden, or did Biden lied to the Americans?
Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland has served for almost 25 years as a permanent legal assistant to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and assistant instructor at the University of Notre Dame College of Commerce. The views expressed herein are those of Cleveland as an individual.[ad_2]