Hunter Biden, Jill Biden and Melania Trump remain in the crosshairs on social media – should they?


In addition to both being “America’s First Ladies” (FLOTUS), Jill Biden and Melania Trump unfortunately share something else in common. Both are regularly ridiculed on social media. The same goes for Hunter Biden, who has come under intense scrutiny despite not holding any public office.

While the spouses, siblings and children of our elected officials have long been used by political opponents to put these officials in the spotlight, the great political divide the country is experiencing has essentially resulted in hardly any a week goes by that the model Melania Trump’s past career or Hunter Biden’s struggles with drug addiction are not rehashed.

Yet for decades the mainstream media knew when to draw the line – what was fair play and what was forbidden. Social media does not have clear lines and as a result the most vile comments are regularly made. In fact, the question “are the families of politicians a fair game on social media” is not really the question, warned Juda Engelmayer, president of HeraldPR.

“Fair implies that there is some sort of mediator, but it’s often a gossip forum with half-baked opinions and partial – even partial facts,” Engelmayer said via an email. “The families of politicians should be banned if they are kept out of public view. When they get involved in politics or, too often, scandals, it becomes a fair game. acts using the power of the main politician, it’s a fair game. If the family is calm and quiet, they should stay that way. If the family member has personal issues, such as drug addiction or health issues, and it does not involve any public concern, it should be left alone – as anyone would want their own spouse and children to be. respected. “

However, as the country remains so divided and consumed with anger and despair that it can bring out the worst in users of the platform. Unlike those in the mainstream media, where journalists are subject to the following rules set by their employers, the average person tweets mindlessly.

“News media has changed over the past few years, and in some ways for the worse, but social media ‘warriors’ often use all the negativity possible to slander those they dislike,” added Engelmayer. “Instead of social media companies censoring information and opinions that business leaders disagree with, they should design algorithms and ask their editors to sift through documents like posts without basic or worthless like those of Dr. Biden and Melania. I am not suggesting more censorship, but just as an editor, publisher or producer can decide what is worth consuming by the public, it’s a role that social media companies should be involved in. Warn people, post a disclaimer telling readers it’s not appropriate, or some other methodology. It can go a long way. “

What is real doesn’t matter

What has also become even more concerning is that social media can allow rumors or hearsay to spread as if they were true facts. So many social media posts have much more in common with grocery store tabloids than with a benchmark newspaper or magazine.

Increasingly, Americans get their news from social media rather than real trusted media – and little of that “news” gets verified.

“Due to paywalls on major news sites, fake news is cheaper than real news,” said Dave Pell, editor of NextDraft and author of the next book, Please scream in your heart.

“Because of how algorithms work on social media sites, fake news spreads faster than real news, and therefore sharing fake news is more immediately rewarding than sharing real news,” Dell added. “Fake news is more satisfying to those who receive it because the message can be refined to tell people what they want to hear rather than telling them the truth.”

What MMS Doesn’t Cover, Social Media Does

There’s also the fact that social media has now attempted to ‘report’ stories the mainstream media has ignored – and Hunter Biden’s infamous stolen laptop (s) remain a case in point. As has been pointed out previously, there is the issue of chain of custody, who has seen the content and whether to believe it.

However, information continues to be disseminated widely on social media without the due diligence that a story of its nature rightly deserves. Maybe the mainstream media should be talking about it, but many on social media now see it as a conspiracy because it is not subject to a report.

“Many people may have lost laptops or cellphones where valuable or compromising data has been exchanged. Nothing sensational comes out of these ordinary crimes, but when it comes to Hunter’s laptop Biden, this piques interest, “noted Daphne Barak, author of the recently published Fighting for one America.

“Social media is not just about news, but opinions as well, and like news and media, debates are key,” Barak said in an email. “The more extreme the better. Hunter Biden is in fashion because he is all: Sex, power, lies, etc. Then there is “espionage” as the icing on the cake. It’s also about the power of the presidency and how some media have worked hard to suppress anything that could harm the president. “

If this political family member was an average person, he probably wouldn’t have that social media traction, but he continued to shop around because it’s a way to launch an indirect attack on President Joe Biden .

“Hunter Biden and the accusations surrounding him are quite alarming and disturbing, and if true, may point to a deeper problem when a president’s family seemingly compromises security or simply uses the power of the last name to lead. matters that might otherwise be considered criminal or simply questionable. Some media have chosen to ignore it and give Hunter a pass, presumably to double their own reckless choices to help harm President Trump at all costs, ” Engelmayer said.

But is Hunter Biden more “fair game” than the old FLOTUS, which continues to be dragged through the mud on social networks despite a fairly low profile?

“Social media warriors are trying to get attention where they think the news media could cover or protect,” Engelmayer said. “People who use social media on this topic and many others feel that news and issues are not properly portrayed or discussed on mainstream news media and are trying to fill a massive void in objective journalism. “


About Teddy Clinton

Check Also

New York Post deserves an apology and a Pulitzer for Hunter Biden coverage – AMAC

AMAC Exclusive – By Andrew Abbott As the public continues …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.